i sent this to a friend, who really like the essay, even though he's not a fan of stanley fish. we were talking about it further and i realized that i'd forgotten to point out that there seems to be a misunderstanding here.
Fish said that he thought it odd that anyone would think an event would be _causally__linked_ to postmodernist relativism--that S11 was something that could put an end to a "rarefied form of academic talk" or, my spin, even signal the end of a "rarefied form of academic talk".
so, i think it was a misreading that sparke dthe whole convo!
slip sliding along the signifying chain,
kelley