After they win...

Peter K. peterk at enteract.com
Sun Oct 21 21:33:33 PDT 2001



>It may well be that Annan encouraged the voters on the Economic
>and Social Council to vote for Austria and Sweden at the expense
>of the USA. But the Americans missed their chance to ensure a
>seat by making sure that only three countries ran for their
>seats (that's how Sudan made it on the commission, after all).
>
>Tim Francis-Wright
>Interfere? Why of course we should interfere! Always do what
>you're best at, that's what I say. [The Doctor, Nightmare of Eden]

Yes, this how I remember it. Also, the US didn't have an ambassador to the UN at the time, right? So they really couldn't keep tabs too well. I thought it was reported that Powell believed they had the votes and some voters (who had either lied to Powell or changed their minds) switched their votes which in my opinion serves the US right, especially considering who the UN ambassador is now. I think his name is John Negraponte, or something like that, a guy who was once ambassador to Honduras and facilitated and/or covered up some of the horrors in central America during Raygun time. So basically, the Americans screwed up because they didn't place enough importance on the seat to get the votes and hence the Europeans took advantage or was their more to it?

Peter



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list