>Careful, guys; this is the point on the merry-go-round where Brad D.
>decided to get off. (Funny how we were grappling with the same
>moral dilemma a month and thousands of posts ago, in the same terms.)
>It seems pretty clear there is no high moral ground here, is there?
>Every solution I can conceive of leads to more innocent people
>dying somewhere.
You've got a point. Unless we can think of something fresh to say - a we that includes me - it's best not to say it. Again. And again. And, just in case the previous 45 iterations hadn't made an impression, again.
Doug