Carl Remick wrote:
>
>
> Anyhow, once again, what are your limits for collateral damage in
> Afghanistan?
>
Carl, since I object so strongly to this form of discourse on Doug's part, I'd better object to it when you do it.
Demands that an opponent answer this question or that aren't really statements/questions on subject matter, they are personal implications about the person you are talking to.
Carrol