Thomas Seay wrote:
>
> <<It's this proposition, which derives from nothing
> and leads to nothing,
> which makes me think that _Empire_ is too frivolous to
> be worth a
> critique.>>
>
> Carrol, Have you even read the book?
>
I read it, carefully, in January. I reread it twice, annotating it and scribbling notes in August. At every single point where they made some claim that needed justification, they would have footnoe, cf. xxxx. And there is the slightest hint in the work as to how the world can be changed.
Carrol