>i didn't say that you did and wasn't engaging you.
Well, who was the Rob in this bit, then?
>you've forgotten that todd's and rob's critique of a
>materialist feminist (structuralist) analysis was about 1. imputing
>rational motivations to men conscious of their desires to oppress women
>any analysis of oppression must involve a structuralist perspective.
Always happy to involve one. And I think CWM's sociological imagination is terrific.
More when the marking allows.
Cheers, Rob.