Jim F.
On Tue, 30 Oct 2001 13:25:05 -0500 Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com>
writes:
> Carrol Cox wrote:
>
> >The evidence for intention in the double-bombing of the Red Cross
> >warehouse does _not_ lie in the far-fetchedness of the coincidence.
> Such
> >coincidences are run-of-the-mill, and such unlikely accidents are
> >_bound_ to happen. But the evidence presented in the article that
> Doug
> >reposted from the WV as to the basic military strategy of the U.S.
> in
> >respect to air power does suggest that the targeting was
> deliberate.
> >That article makes it _likely_ that non-military targets will be
> >targeted.
>
> Speaking of which, CNBC had an item in its headline crawl this
> morning saying that sources told NBC News that the Red Cross
> facility
> was deliberately bombed because the Taliban were allegedly stealing
>
> food from it. I haven't heard any more than that, though.
>
> Doug
>
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.