Thank you. You admit that you put words in my mouth.
> > It's really funny that Dennis should make fun of me for military
> > fantasies that I don't hold.
>
> If you don't hold them, then don't express them.
I didn't express any fantasies. I was presenting a thought experiment, as a contribution to the consideration of alternative messaging that the anti-war movement could engage in.
> > This is a straw man argument which misrepresents my views. I'm not
> > surprised, since the only thing Dennis can send in response to my emails
> > is cheap shots.
>
> For an street-fightin' anarchist, you seem remarkably frail. I simply asked
> direct questions based on the alternative you raised. And yes, I have a
> certain view of you, again, based on what I read here and not inspired by
> the need to stitch together straw.
You've stitched together enough straw to have yourself a straw bale house for the winter.
> > Are you arguing, Dennis, that we should all abandon looking at these
> > questions through the lens of our principles? Should Nathan not make his
> > analysis based on his liberalism?
>
> Of course not, and you know better than to ask such stupid questions.
Well, perhaps I shouldn't waste my time arguing with somebody who argues against stupid strawman positions.
Chuck0