While there is an off-hand reference to this in the article, the article's most important point is that Microsoft's anti-copying protections are targeted at *legal* users doing what should be standard practice--installing their software on any machine they own. The fact that Microsoft can get away with such policies with little timely pressure by regulating agencies AND that quasi-religious/masochistic consumers don't expect more speaks volumes.
Jim
At 04:11 AM 10/31/01, you wrote:
>Windows XP system 'pirated by crackers'
>
>Rebecca Allison
>Wednesday October 31, 2001
>The Guardian
"Don't take five, take what you want."
-Bill Drummond (of the former Kopyright Liberation Front)