Nathan corrected

[James Heartfield]

In message <3948120513.1000380533 at ccs-aha442.adsroot.itcs.umich.edu>,
lweiger at umich.edu writes
>However, if Clinton and Co had managed to kill bin Laden a 
>couple of years ago, many lives probably would've been saved.
>
>-- Luke

Do you think so? Do you really believe that the campaign against the US
is down to one deluded man? After all, Clinton did take some fairly
decisive action against bin Laden (or actually an aspirin factory in the
Sudan). Was it effective in stopping attacks on the US?

-- 
James Heartfield