Trees sowed in May bear rotten September fruit

/ dave / arouet at winternet.com
Sun Sep 16 21:15:10 PDT 2001


Kevin Robert Dean wrote:

> The only thing I found is the opposite of the claim in
> the LA Times article. This year 2000 report says on
> the State Dept's website claims an increase in poppy
> seed cultivation.  Can anyone independantly confirm
> Mr. Scheer's claims?

The original article touting reductions in cultivation appears to have
been published in the New York Times, two days before Scheer published
in commentary in the L.A. Times. Here's the abstract from the NYT
website - I'm not a paying subscriber, so I can't retrieve the whole
article. However, the gist of it is summarized in the first paragraph anyway:

--

May 20, 2001, Sunday 
Taliban's Ban On Poppy A Success, U.S. Aides Say 
By BARBARA CROSSETTE 
Source: The New York Times
Section: Foreign Desk 
763 words

Drug Enforcement Agency 

The first American narcotics experts to go to Afghanistan under Taliban
rule have concluded that the movement's ban on opium-poppy cultivation
appears to have wiped out the world's largest crop in less than a year,
officials said today. The American... 

--

A version of the Barbara Crossette article did appear on the Australian
Sydney Morning Herald site as well:

http://www.smh.com.au/news/0105/21/world/world7.html

--

So I think the above substantiates fairly reliably the Powell/U.S. Govt.
"gift" Scheer talks about, but obviously the underlying question of just
whether the the $43 million was based on the Taliban's actual ability to
eliminate the poppy production in a year (as the articles and Govt.
sources claim) or a bribe of sorts related to future production declines
(which would imply a certain amount of obfuscation on the part of U.S.
and Taliban authorities), or "drought relief," might be open to some
debate. In any case, the money seems to have changed hands just a few
short months prior to the terrorist attack. Whether the starving Afghani
farmers benefitted from any of it, or a portion was diverted to enable
the bin Laden organization, is anyone's guess. I doubt there was much
accountability asked for, or received, once the money left U.S. hands.

--

/  dave  /



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list