> > 1. No war. No bombs. No collateral damage. No sanctions.
>
> And absolutely no hope of deterring future terrorism.
.
Without endorsing Carol's proposal, do you really think it's possible to
"deter" suicide terrorists? How exectly do you do this? If they're willing
to die in a fiery inferno, how will war, bombs or collateral damage deter
them?
Seth
>
>