Writ Mandamus

Brenda Rosser shelter at tassie.net.au
Fri Sep 21 20:17:15 PDT 2001


Hi lbo-ers I just want to distract you folks again by yet another uninvited (and probably unwanted) intrusion:

Could it be possible that Timothy McVeigh was innocent? Did the FBI and CIA do a 'cover up'? Why should anyone focus on such questions at this time?

Answer: The US is likely to have an enemy within. .....(okay, so you know all about that - but it (ie this possible incident of corruption) still needs to be examined...don't you think??)

Yoshie said: "One of the talking points (for a quickie conversation) is, "When the bombers of the Federal Building in Oklahoma turned out to be white guys, you didn't think it was a good idea to bomb all their families, friends, neighbors, ex-class mates, all who had the same reactionary thoughts as theirs, all who had the misfortune of having ever lived in the same country as theirs, all who had the same complexion, religion, etc. as theirs...did you?"

It would pay for lbo-ers (and others) to read the complete contents of the Writ of Mandamus (where Tim McVeigh's defence asks for CIA and FBI records). It's on the Net. Go to the following page for the following links to the complete contents of the Writ: http://www.fas.org/irp/threat/mcveigh/index.html PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OF PETITIONER-DEFENDANT,

TIMOTHY JAMES McVEIGH AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT

MARCH 25, 1997

Front

OVERVIEW

I. INTRODUCTION

II. PHYSICAL AND POLITICAL MAGNITUDE OF THE

DESTRUCTION OF THE ALFRED P. MURRAH BUILDING

III. THE ARREST OF TIMOTHY McVEIGH

IV. THE GRAND JURY RETURNS THE INDICTMENT OF "OTHERS UNKNOWN"

V. THE "OTHERS UNKNOWN" TO THE GRAND JURY

VI. PRIOR WARNING, ATF INFORMANTS, AND POSSIBLE "OTHERS UNKNOWN"

VII. BEYOND ELOHIM CITY

VIII. PROCEDURAL HISTORY OF DISCOVERY REQUESTS

IX. GOVERNMENT EVASION OF ITS DISCOVERY RESPONSIBILITIES

X. AUTHORITY

XI. SPECIFIC RELIEF REQUESTED

This document outlines that several witnesses directly contradict the evidence against McVeigh and that the CIA and FBI clearly had hard evidence linking the Oklahoma bombing to middle eastern political activists.

Maybe I've missed something here????. But why would these two American agencies hold back information for so long when someone in America is facing capital punishment and his defence relies on the evidence that these agencies hold?? It makes no sense, unless they had something to hide in the first instance.

Brenda Rosser PS: This is my last posting on this subject. If you choose to ignore this......... ------------------------------



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list