----- Original Message ----- From: "Hakki Alacakaptan" <nucleus at superonline.com> To: <lbo-talk at lists.panix.com> Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2002 1:22 AM Subject: RE: Fwd: I urge you to read this in its entirety
> ||
> || Strategic intentionality is not the same as conspiracy
> || *theories*....................
> ||
> || Ian
> ||
> ||
> || And pray tell, what is the "strategic intentionality" of the
> || IDF attacking
> || the PA HQ and not that of HAMAS? What is the logic behind the action?
> ||
> || Naji
> ||
>
> The Netanya bomber, who gave Israel the pretext for the latest invasion, was
> from Hamas. I know, maybe Israel wants to do something really terrible to
> them but hasn't made its mind up yet. Or could it be that Sharon wants to
> keep Hamas intact so it can upstage and replace the PLO? Could it be that
> was Israel's "strategic" whatever right from the start, when it financed
> Hamas and let its leader walk after being arrested in possession of infantry
> weapons? Is that X-files-zone or "strategic intentionality"? Open your eyes,
> Ian. If it's still dark, then pull your head out of the sand.
>
> Hakki
=======================
Exsqueeeezeme but as you're the resident conspiracy theorist on this list, you're the last person I'd trust to divine the intent of the Israeli government.
BTW, fuck you.
Ian