i agree...i was just pointing out how it can be read. it can be interpreted a solely "anti drug" or whatever. i don't think the academy (from what i can discern from past patterns) derives any kind of subtleties such as your interpretation.
>
>I would say that the movie is not so much about drugs
>as it was about making pacts with the Devil to skirt
>around life....drugs, television and sex (I am not
>against either of the three) were the means used in
>the movie. The author could have used excessive
>jogging, gambling or any of a number of other
>passtimes.
yeah but using "drugs" and that lifestyle made it hip and more consumer friendly in the eyes of the academy. i'm not condeming the film at all but i don't think it would have been nominated if it were about excessive jogging etc.
~M.E.