Food Is, Still, Clearly Not a Human Right - answers to you al

Charles Brown CharlesB at cncl.ci.detroit.mi.us
Wed Apr 3 11:17:05 PST 2002


Food Is, Still, Clearly Not a Human Right - answers to you al

From: "Justin Schwartz" <jkschw at hotmail.com>


> Food Is, Still, Clearly Not a Human Right - answers to you all
>"Justin Schwartz" <jkschw at hotmail.com>
>
>
>Not what I mean by a right. A right to X (I tire of repeating) means that
>you may not take X away from mer without my say so.
>
>^^^^^^^^
>
>CB: What is a freedom ?
>
>

A negative freedom to X is a lack of constraint or compulsion to X. A positive freedom to X is the possession of the resources and effective ability to X. A "real" freedom (in the Rousseau-Hegel-Marx sense) to X is the identification with X as a goal, the giving of X as a law to oneself.

Since you asked. . . .

^^^^^^^^^^^

CB: What is the relationship between rights and freedoms ? What is the relationship between rights and the state ?



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list