No ANSWER

Yoshie Furuhashi furuhashi.1 at osu.edu
Wed Apr 24 16:17:51 PDT 2002


The best way to marginalize the WWP would be simply to out-organize, rather than to post e-mail messages about its position on North Korea, etc., much less on Hungary in 1956. The reason is that such criticisms won't resonate at all except with those who have already bought into one brand of left politics or another and thus care very much about the history of the political left. In short, no one except confirmed leftists give a damn about what the WWP stands for. This is America, the land of no historical memory, with no established organization on the left nationally known beyond leftist cyber-ghettoes. Likewise, criticisms of the WWP's methods (e.g., inflating the number of supporters, taking the credit even when credit is not fully due, making opportunistic alliances, seeking to take the leadership of a coalition) or structure (e.g., authoritarian, hierarchical, etc.) won't do either, because that's how things work in the real world beyond the cyber-ghettoes mentioned above and thus no surprise to Americans outside them.

To out-organize the WWP, you'd simply have to work harder, for instance, contacting all the likely constituencies sooner and better (e.g., in protest against Israel, contact all the mosques, Islamic centers, Arab-American organizations, black organizations, etc.) than the WWP would. All those Muslims and Arab-Americans at the Ellipse didn't attend the WWP rally because they approved of all parts of the WWP politics; they did so because it was the WWP, not other formations, that contacted them first, made convenient transportation available, etc.

It's that simple, as far as mobilization is concerned, but this simple and yet hard work of collecting phone numbers/e-addresses of leaders & members of likely constituencies, networking with them in person (and not only immediately prior to big events, but also regularly), attending their social functions (dinners, picnics, etc.) when appropriate (especially when invited), sending out announcements/invitations/etc. in a timely and respectful fashion, making it easy for large numbers of people to participate, (if possible) winning over intelligent, articulate, and attractive individuals from targeted constituencies to your politics, etc. is, alas, *not* the normal practice of leftists (if it were, the left in the USA would be bigger, I think).

BTW, the WWP's strength is only in mobilization for demos, not party-building. It's telling that every time it holds demos and rallies, participants in them change radically depending on issues (e.g., Serbian-Americans for an anti-NATO rally, Muslims and Arab-Americans for a pro-Palestinian rally). In other words, it has gained no large permanent following.

Can other formations do better, though? For instance, can critics of the WWP (be they anarchists, the SP, Solidarity, or whatever) educate Muslims and Arab-Americans who show up at pro-Palestinian demos into caring also about Plan Colombia and other issues; and beyond single issues, can they win many of them over to passionate oppositions to imperialism in general, and best of all, to left-wing class politics? -- Yoshie

* Calendar of Events in Columbus: <http://www.osu.edu/students/sif/calendar.html> * Anti-War Activist Resources: <http://www.osu.edu/students/sif/activist.html> * Student International Forum: <http://www.osu.edu/students/sif/> * Committee for Justice in Palestine: <http://www.osu.edu/students/CJP/>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list