Anarcho-Stalinism (chuck)

[SergioL652 at aol.com]

In a message dated 8/6/2002 1:24:41 PM Pacific Daylight Time, 
dhenwood at panix.com writes:


> They accepted unions right after WW2 because they thought they didn't 
> have much choice. Thirty years later they started busting them in 
> earnest (not that they were ever so mighty in the south). Why, if the 
> co-optation/distraction strategy was so effective?
> 
> 

Would the precense of the Soviet Union and the Cold war contribute to this?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <../attachments/20020806/5a7eaf78/attachment.htm>