Anarcho-Stalinism (chuck)

Doug Henwood dhenwood at panix.com
Tue Aug 6 14:52:10 PDT 2002


SergioL652 at aol.com wrote:


>In a message dated 8/6/2002 1:24:41 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
>dhenwood at panix.com writes:
>
>>They accepted unions right after WW2 because they thought they didn't
>>have much choice. Thirty years later they started busting them in
>>earnest (not that they were ever so mighty in the south). Why, if the
>>co-optation/distraction strategy was so effective?
>>
>
>
>
>Would the precense of the Soviet Union and the Cold war contribute to this?

For sure. There are reasons to miss the USSR.

Doug



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list