but he speaks - constantly - to the need for repeal of taft-hartley...is the personal the political in every sense of the word(s)? Does his personal experience as a driven, controlling, even obsessed volunteer who expects the same from others ( the kind of person frequently moved towards political action) make him less qualified to be, say, a president, than the kind of moral scum who regularly run for, and win, that office? and even have the support of some around here?
when upper middle class feminists end their fawning love for the slimeball due to his support for abortion and see clinton as the wretched sexist slug he was/is, I might become more inclined to fault old ralph for his less than perfect life record regarding some subjects of pc....even then, might is the operative word.
fs