>The "knowing the enemy" bit is great, but what can "socialising
>capital" even mean? I thought that capital was anti-social
>"essentially". Maybe you mean something shorter term, like put the
>"commanding heights in the hands of the people" or something like
>that. Hmmm.... But in the longer term, money in all its forms must
>surely go, no?
That's the dream, isn't it? I quote Negri too often saying "Money has but one face, that of the boss." Still, I thought capital wasn't so much antisocial as partly socialized - as opposed to smaller-scale systems of production that preceded it. I'm just trying to figure out how one goes about transforming the world that exists - where to start, where the vulnearbilities/possibilities are, etc.
Doug