power

[Catherine Driscoll]

> 
> And you are conflating power-to with power-over and not recognizing the
> distinction of
> using power as a term to define and power as a term of explanation.
> 
> Ian

Definitions shape explanations and the other way around. The distinction is 
spurious at best. 

If power-to and power-over are so dissimilar, how come they're both 
specifically/definitively modes of "power-"?  

Catherine