|| -----Original Message-----
|| From: joanna bujes
||
||
|| Fuck the Viagra; I mean if that was the point, a dildo would
|| do just fine.
|| BUT, if we're questioning assumptions, how about questioning
|| the assumption
|| of male/female as separate individuals during lovemaking. I
|| mean haven't
|| you ever experienced pleasure (during lovemaking) as a kind of
|| energy that
|| circulates from one into the other and which is amplified as it
|| goes round
|| and around. ( You know...the old "pleasure shared is pleasure
|| doubled (and
|| doubled again :) )..." Don't men enjoy that?
||
|| Joanna B.
||
I do and I imagine others do as well. Trouble is, on top endocrine disruptor industrial pollutants, the competitivity and calculation of our working lives increasingly intrudes on and pollutes everything else. Lovemaking then so easily becomes a transaction, where trust and abandon is impossible. Males are as usual more easily affected by this, due to their physical and psychological frailty. Males aren't designed to last, just to produce new genetic code and upload it to females while it's still uncorrupted. They're designed to die early as the code gets corrupted by constant copying, whereas female genetic code is limited edition and therefore more error-free. They're bit players in the evolution game, to which they're relative latecomers, and their frailty has to do with the fact that they're basically modified females, a kludge IOW. Don't think the revo'll fix that so I still say we need a technical fix: Tantra yoga, genetic engineering, safe drugs - something.
Hakki