poygamy

joanna bujes joanna.bujes at ebay.sun.com
Mon Feb 11 11:36:55 PST 2002


At 11:29 AM 02/11/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>I do and I imagine others do as well. Trouble is, on top endocrine disruptor
>industrial pollutants, the competitivity and calculation of our working
>lives increasingly intrudes on and pollutes everything else. Lovemaking then
>so easily becomes a transaction, where trust and abandon is impossible.

I agree completely...but then why go into an "anatomy is destiny" argument...?


>Males are as usual more easily affected by this, due to their physical and
>psychological frailty. Males aren't designed to last, just to produce new
>genetic code and upload it to females while it's still uncorrupted. They're
>designed to die early as the code gets corrupted by constant copying,
>whereas female genetic code is limited edition and therefore more
>error-free. They're bit players in the evolution game, to which they're
>relative latecomers, and their frailty has to do with the fact that they're
>basically modified females, a kludge IOW. Don't think the revo'll fix that
>so I still say we need a technical fix: Tantra yoga, genetic engineering,
>safe drugs - something.

what's IOW?

Also, and here I know I'm really going to get laughed at, ok, here we go, but why focus so exclusively on who comes and how often....I mean, finally, isn't the aboslute best part of sex the part where time stops... and it doesn't even matter whether you come or not because the overwhelming feeling is that you can do no wrong?

Joanna



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list