As you noticed the area of crossover with Dimitrov is very specific, almost too specific on this topic to be terribly important. It is his political conclusions (people's front - popular front) that needs careful thought in our context (again I speak from my own traditions - I think you used the word bloc for much the same thing).
Greg Schofield Perth Australia g_schofield at dingoblue.net.au _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________
Use LesTecML Mailer (http://www.lestec.com.au/) * Powerful filters. * Create you own headers. * Have email types launch scripts. * Use emails to automat your work. * Add comments on receive. * Use scripts to extract and check emails. * Use MAID to create taylor-made solutions. * LesTecML Mailer is fully controlled by REXX. * A REXX interpreter is freely available. _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________
--- Message Received --- From: "Hakki Alacakaptan" <nucleus at superonline.com> To: <lbo-talk at lists.panix.com> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 18:56:56 +0200 Subject: RE: Bonapartism, Fascism & our new order
|| -----Original Message-----
|| From: Greg Schofield
||
I agree with everything you wrote - the KPD in 33 , etc. - and it's a lot more thought-out than my quick-and-dirty points but why then are you trying to revive the Dimitrov thesis?
Hakki