--- Justin Schwartz <jkschw at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> >
> >Even though my instint is telling me otherwise, I
> >would think that once a convicted sex offender is
> out
> >on parole, with his tracking device firmly attached
> to
> >his body should be able to surf the internet
> >unhindered, you know--free speech and all....But
> soon
> >he won't be able to...
>
> Surfing the net isn't a form of speech. Whether
> restrictions on using the
> net to communicate things that are speech are
> reasonable time place and
> manner restrictions on that speech depends. If a
> sexcual predator has been
> using the net to entice children to have sex, why
> wouldn;t it be a
> reasonable restriction to prohibitr him from using
> the net at all? And if
> the price of using it at all is survellience, why
> isn't that raesonable?
> Though how would it beenforced, since the pervert
> could use someone else's
> computer. jks
>
> >
>
>http://www.cnn.com/2002/TECH/industry/01/05/sex.offender.monitor.ap/index.html
> >
> >SPRINGFIELD, Illinois (AP) -- During a seminar on
> >computer software designed to monitor children's
> >Internet use and protect them from sexual
> predators,
> >Don Spurlin wondered if the product couldn't be
> turned
> >around to monitor the predators
> themselves.....ect....
> >
> >=====
> >Kevin Dean
> >Buffalo, NY
> >ICQ: 8616001
> >http://www.yaysoft.com
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >Do You Yahoo!?
> >Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
> >http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/
>
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
> Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger:
> http://messenger.msn.com
>
===== Kevin Dean Buffalo, NY ICQ: 8616001 http://www.yaysoft.com
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/