Shane, I believe you were the one who suggested that the likely suspect in the real anthrax mailings was "fascistic provocateurs within the US National Security State apparatus."
If "they" are so clever, which "they" is writing the NYT editorials, and which "they" is shredding documents for Arthur Andersen?"
Perhaps there is a difference between ironic use of cultural idioms, conspiracism, and investigative reporting.
Perhaps you think not.
How many dadaists does it take to change a light bulb?
-Chip
Shane Mage
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-lbo-talk at lists.panix.com
> [mailto:owner-lbo-talk at lists.panix.com]On Behalf Of Shane Mage
> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 1:19 PM
> To: lbo-talk at lists.panix.com
> Subject: attn. Chip Berlet: NYTIMES goes conspiritorialist
>
>
> From 25/01/02 Editorial:
>
> "It would certainly make life easier for Arthur
> Andersen if the world accepted its story, the
> accounting industry version of the
> lone-gunman theory."
>