Just becuase he was affiliated with "the enemy," how does that equal combatant? This seems like exaggerated internment, as it were.
Justin Schwartz <jkschw at hotmail.com> wrote:
>The stories say he was in the planning stage only....now how would that be
>different from what we are doing with Iraq? Cuteness aside, talking about
>blowing up the US is not a crime (let's ignore any recent "interpretations"
>by the DOJ shall we?). So, unless they can point to an action taken in
>furtherance, on what basis can they hold the guy? Justin any thoughts, as
>I would think you see appeals from federal conspiricay and RICO stuff?
>
>
That in part is why they are holding him as a military prisoner. If they had to bring him before a judge with that sort of crap, he judge would throw out the "charges" and let him go. Beside's, he's a PR lowlife without a family any civilized people can connect with.
jks
_________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
--------------------------------- Do You Yahoo!? Sign-up for Video Highlights of 2002 FIFA World Cup -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <../attachments/20020612/73447827/attachment.htm>