Alterman on Chomsky

[geert lovink]

> From: "Micheal Ellis" <onyxmirr at earthlink.net>
>
> one can always tell when someone is saying something just to say get
invited
> to the right parties etc when some one goes at chomsky for the faurisson
thing and
> the khmer rouge. it's become the mantra or whatever despite the fact that
chomsky
> has addressed those issues numerous times...his replies are never included
either
> nor addressed. very bizarre in it's systematicity....

The problem on Chomsky's side is systematic, in my view. According to
his Grand Theory of the supremacy of US foreign policy analysis over all
other elements, the enemy of the US establishment is by default Chomsky's
friend. We can go back to the wellknown Khmer Rouge and Faurisson
examples but that's not necessary. Look at Kosovo and the way how he
actively supported the corrupt nationalists around Milosevic. There is
plenty of evidence for this. This googled URL is just a random one:
http://www.newsandletters.org/Issues/1999/Dec/12.99_chomsky.htm
The next casus is already in the making: Chomsky's support for Saddam
Houssein.

Geert