It gets even more difficult when you acknowledge that the rule of law prevents you from changing some of society's gravest injustices.
dave dorkin <ddorkin1 at yahoo.com> wrote: actually, a lot harder than I think you let on...with a lot of very different ends and bigger fundamental disagreements you end up with more and more problems for which Rorty, Walzer et al have very little on offer-have you looked at headscarve cases in Bavaria, France and England which are just the tip of that iceberg?
> A liberal state premised on the fact of fundamental
> disagreement about ends,
> and based on the rule of law--is that so hard?
>
> jks
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com
--------------------------------- Do You Yahoo!? Sign-up for Video Highlights of 2002 FIFA World Cup -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <../attachments/20020620/ff1e5829/attachment.htm>