The Sopranos

[Kelley]

At 12:36 AM 3/5/02 -0500, Seth Ackerman wrote:
>Kelley wrote:
>
> >  i got a couple
> > of offlists that suggested that i was too opaque, so i felt we needed to
> > establish a common meaning behind what i said. i don't have an alternative
> > explanation. i don't need one in order to poke holes in the one proffered.
> >
> > there are alternative explanations we could explore but, alas, my
> > favoritist lefty men in the world, i don't have time.
>
>Fair enough.
>
>But just to clarify - you wrote, before, that the model-wonk relationship is
>evidence of, quote, "raging masculinism." So you must have *some* kind of
>explanation for it in mind, however yet unformed.
>
>Seth

nope. i was saying that the raging masculinism was evidenced by a failure 
to recognize that sperling has no power, relatively speaking. :)

now, i have a date!

kelley