> i got a couple
> of offlists that suggested that i was too opaque, so i felt we needed to
> establish a common meaning behind what i said. i don't have an alternative
> explanation. i don't need one in order to poke holes in the one proffered.
>
> there are alternative explanations we could explore but, alas, my
> favoritist lefty men in the world, i don't have time.
Fair enough.
But just to clarify - you wrote, before, that the model-wonk relationship is evidence of, quote, "raging masculinism." So you must have *some* kind of explanation for it in mind, however yet unformed.
Seth