> i was annoyed with the--once again!--generalized claim: power is an
> aphrodisiac.
>
> well, no, in general, men are not, to my knowledge, turned on enough by
> powerful women that they'd overlook whether that woman was conventionally
> attractive.
>
> it's strikes me as pretty tragic that there's a wealth of literature out
> there that could help us deal with these topics, and yet, most of the time
> we're all stuck on talking about them as if we had to invent the wheel.
Kelley, the literature can only help us if someone actually cites it. Why don't you lay out some of the ideas you're referring to?
Seth