indeed! (the argument, i believe, is this: yes, you cannot have absolute measures, but you can nonetheless build an ethical scale, based exactly on such things as pain/nervous system, least harm, etc. perhaps we can eat fruit because we are not subverting the "supposed" biological purpose of it...).
> Anyway, ALL life is sacred and not just animal life.
and why stop at life? what is the real difference between johnson and the rock that he kicks to demonstrate a futile point? we wouldnt kick johnson to demonstrate a point, though perhaps we should! ;-)
> What a hypocrite I am!
welcome to the club, sir!
--ravi, over the limit for the day :-(