----- Original Message ----- From: "C. G. Estabrook" <galliher at alexia.lis.uiuc.edu> To: <lbo-talk at lists.panix.com> Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 4:42 PM Subject: Re: Walzer on the Left
> [Those made uncomfortable by Chomsky's mordant criticisms of US crimes
> have had for a while a standard if quite false litany of charges against
> him. Those unaware of what he actually wrote say things like, "NC's
> writings on the KR could hardly have fallen further from the mark, and the
> fact that he has continually refused to rethink them shows something about
> the old man's abstinence." So, once gain, here's the story, this time from
> an unimpeachable source, the pro-W.o.T. writer Christopher Hitchens, in
> 1985. --CGE]
I've read through the Course and the Cassandra once or twice. Yawn. I don't consider Hitch to be an unimpeachable source in any incarnation. I actually prefer this undergrad's thesis: http://jim.com/canon.htm
-- Luke