>
>Chris Kromm wrote:
>
>>How "perversely wrong" does someone have to be before they are no longer
>>"smart and interesting"?
>
>Sometimes perverse can be interesting, in many fields of endeavor.
>
>Doug
For example, Judge Posner is perversely wrong about a great deal, but always smart and interesting, at least almost always. Compared to him, Jim H's affection for the interal combustion engine is a milsetone of progressivism.
jks
_________________________________________________________________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com