Hakki
|| -----Original Message-----
|| From: Justin Schwartz
||
|| >
|| >Chris Kromm wrote:
|| >
|| >>How "perversely wrong" does someone have to be before they
|| are no longer
|| >>"smart and interesting"?
|| >
|| >Sometimes perverse can be interesting, in many fields of endeavor.
|| >
|| >Doug
||
||
|| For example, Judge Posner is perversely wrong about a great
|| deal, but always
|| smart and interesting, at least almost always. Compared to him, Jim H's
|| affection for the interal combustion engine is a milsetone of
|| progressivism.
||
|| jks
||