it would differ in that the US wouldnt be doing it, to point out just the obvious though non-trivial difference - i believe its non-trivial because a whole lot of differences would spring out of that (the efforts of the multi-national forces in somalia could possibly be an example of these differences).
> I think that those who bleat about "police actions"
> and conducting "criminal investigations" are blowing smoke, 'cause when you
> get right down to it, they seem to prefer that nothing be done.
thats just your belief and should count for nothing in a logical debate, just as my belief that anyone espousing your position is potentially acting out of a sense of revenge.
if not lawful action on the basis of some accepted standard, what else? might makes right? ends justify the means?
--ravi