>From dhenwood at panix.com Fri May 10 23:34:34 2002
Received: from uclink4.berkeley.edu (uclink4.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.25.39])
by dont.panix.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/PanixLC1.6) with ESMTP id XAA08959
for <lbo-talk at lists.panix.com>; Fri, 10 May 2002 23:34:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [10.0.1.2] (12-233-31-219.client.attbi.com [12.233.31.219])
by uclink4.berkeley.edu (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g4B3YWk00052
for <lbo-talk at lists.panix.com>; Fri, 10 May 2002 20:34:33 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: jbdelong at uclink.berkeley.edu (Unverified) Message-Id: <a05101006b9023fe758ea@[10.0.1.2]> In-Reply-To: <NFBBICFMIKGPJNEEGOLOKEOPEAAA.sawicky at bellatlantic.net> References: <NFBBICFMIKGPJNEEGOLOKEOPEAAA.sawicky at bellatlantic.net> Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 20:27:03 -0700 To: lbo-talk at lists.panix.com From: Bradford DeLong <jbdelong at uclink.berkeley.edu> Subject: RE: Decline of the Welfare State Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
>Not at all. The welfare state in the New Deal sense went great
>guns until about 1978. Since then I would say it has had a bumpy
>ride and neither sprang forward nor fell back.
>
>The welfare debate has certainly changed for the worse, but
>there is less to the systemic change than meets the eye.
>
>mbs
Can we distinguish between the social insurance state, which serves the middle class, and the welfare state, which serves the poor?
Brad DeLong