2nd-wave attax

Doug Henwood dhenwood at panix.com
Sun May 19 13:32:54 PDT 2002



>Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 10:13:51 -0700 (PDT)
>From: Miles Jackson <cqmv at pdx.edu>
>X-X-Sender: cqmv at freke.odin.pdx.edu
>To: lbo-talk at lists.panix.com
>Subject: Re: second-wave attacks
>In-Reply-To: <000701c1ff39$f9041e60$2a822844 at wanarb01.mi.comcast.net>
>Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0205191007400.672-100000 at freke.odin.pdx.edu>
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
>
>
>
>On Sun, 19 May 2002, Dennis Perrin wrote:
>
>> I agree in general with that, and don't think that every single list memb=
>er
>> would look benignly on another al-Q death squad attack. I had in mind tho=
>se
>> who brush off the remains of the dead in order to wave their fist, chant
>> clich=E9s, and pretend (or worse truly believe) that there's nothing to w=
>orry
>> about, that those massacred in New York are mere imperial collateral mulc=
>h.
>>
>> DP
>
>Interesting double standard here: deaths in NYC shouldn't be treated as
>collateral mulch, but deaths in Afghanistan should. Am I naive to think
>that people should try to maintain consistent moral standards?
>
>Miles



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list