Rack 'em up and shoot (was: Re: sex and the left)

[Gordon Fitch]

Well, if you can't remember what you meant or what you were
referring to, I don't think I'm going to get the answer out
of a book or off a web site.

The text I wanted to critique was the LBO-talk sex-police-
of-the-Left thread, but apparently it has all mysteriously
evaporated, leaving not even an essence behind.

-- Gordon



Kelley:
> no. don't recall. I don't read every post. I'd suggest a library. 
> interlibrary loan is healthy in NY. i'm sure that there is a wealth of 
> information on the topic on the WWW. IME, it's better to work on a common 
> text that we're reading and critiquing together. How about Mulvey? For a 
> bit on desire as productive, rather than lack?
> 
> kelley
> 
> let your fingers do the walking
> 
> At 07:59 AM 11/1/02 -0500, Gordon Fitch wrote:
> >I'm just trying to get with the program, after being
> >informed:
> >
> >jimmyjames at softhome.net:
> >> Well, yeah, since the theoretical underpinnings of most of this is a
> >> rejection of essentialism, then you're waaaaaaaay outta touch.
> >
> >As you may recall, I asked where the essentialism lay, but
> >only silence ensued (at least in my perhaps imperfect view of
> >LBO-talk).
> 
> 
> 
> >Do let me know, though, if you can manage it.
> >
> >
> >-- Gordon

-- 

                (<><>)         /*/
       }"{   G*rd*n   }"{   gcf at panix.com   }"{ 
{ http://www.etaoin.com | latest new material 8/5/02 <-adv't