Al-Q Honcho Hit
npchilds at connect.ab.ca
npchilds at connect.ab.ca
Tue Nov 5 12:47:21 PST 2002
I think the point here, as it was in Afghanistan, was that the U.S. has
arrogated to itself the right to decide who is a 'prick' and who should be
'incapacitated' through the application of massive, indiscriminant force.
Is the world a better place with less AQ and Taliban running things? Yes,
I think so. Is massive, unquestioned force or missiles fired from drones
the only effective way to achieving that? No. Contrary to what the media
etc. would have us believe there are other options (and yes some would
involve force, that's not necessarily a bad thing) other than the course
the U.S. has embarked on for the foreseeable future.
As noted, the next Hellfire could be FARC and 'collateral damage' as
'terrorist targets', or somewhere Venezuela or the West Bank.
NPC
>
> Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 14:47:26 -0800
> From: "Luke Weiger" <lweiger at umich.edu>
> Subject: Re: Al-Q Honcho Hit
>
> Justin wrote:
>
>
>> So, Dennis, you're in favor of CIA assassinations in
>> the time-honored manner of the Mossad? A new depth,
>> even for you. jks
>
> So, you don't think their absence from Al Qaeda likely makes the world
> a better place? Exactly how else was the US to incapacitate these
> pricks?
>
>
More information about the lbo-talk
mailing list