>Lacks my signature touch, but otherwise I've got no real problem with it.
>The al-Q operatives that were hit were a military target -- no block of
>houses destroyed, hotels ripped apart, refugee camps strafed; simply some
>thugs in a car with, apparently, explosives, wiped out. While I don't think
>this is the sole way to go, in this instance I see nothing wrong.
>
>Al-Q is at war with us. You may not believe it, accept it, want to deal with
>it, or wish to change the subject. But they are out there planning new
>attacks, minus these six.
>
>DP
Have you seen the names of all six men killed in this car? Have you seen proof that they were all involved in terrorists threats to the U.S.? Or is the CIA's word proof enough for you? It isn't for me. Our country can't kill anyone anywhere anytime and say we know they were terrorists but aren't required to prove it. If we engage in that sort of behavior we are criminals ourselves.
John Thornton