On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Nathan Newman wrote:
> "principled opposition"? Of course not, since he voted for the bill.
> Unprincipled opposition, yes. The very introduction of the
> anti-abortion provision was designed to derail the bankruptcy bill.
That's not what the WSJ article says. It says it was introduced by Schumer, who was and is foresquare for bankruptcy reform, and never thought for a moment this would derail it once he had Hyde on board.
What a great article that was, BTW, Doug. Thanks for posting it. It was a pleasure to read.
Michael