--- billbartlett at dodo.com.au wrote:
> At 5:42 PM -0500 21/11/02, Yoshie Furuhashi wrote:
>
> >At 1:36 PM -0800 11/20/02, andie nachgeborenen
> wrote:
> >> > To acquit you'd have to believe
> >>> the guns were planted and
> >>> the defense suggested that but was not really
> able
> >>> to make a strong enough
> >>> case for it.
> >>
> >>Yeah, you have to be able to prove that.
> >
> >True, but it must be exceedingly difficult for
> defense attorneys to
> >discover evidence to really prove that guns, drugs,
> and the like
> >were planted by cops. What are lawyers to do if
> they can't find
> >unquestionably damning evidence of a frame-up?
>
> Plead guilty. Since the criminal justice system is
> apparently based
> on presumption of guilt (Justin asserts, you have to
> prove the guns
> were planted, so this seems to be the case) and you
> can't prove your
> innocence, then legally you are guilty whether you
> did it or not.
>
> Plead guilty and beg for mercy.
>
> Bill Bartlett
> Bracknell Tas
__________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com