No, I will give credit where credit is due, but the news that the SWP was the driving force behind the anti-war movement of the 1960s is recent news to me. In fact, there seems to be a shrill defense of the SWP's role in the last month as all of the Nation columnists go after the WWP?
Is somebody getting defensive about history around here? ;-)
I'm sure that the folks running the WWP think they are the driving force behind the current anti-war movement. We all know that this isn't the case, but we'll let the WWPbots live with their illusions.
Chuck0
------------------------------------------------------------ Personal homepage -> http://chuck.mahost.org/ Infoshop.org -> http://www.infoshop.org/ MutualAid.org -> http://www.mutualaid.org/ Alternative Press Review -> http://www.altpr.org/ Practical Anarchy Online -> http://www.practicalanarchy.org/ Anarchy: AJODA -> http://www.anarchymag.org/
AIM: AgentHelloKitty
Web publishing and services for your nonprofit: Bread and Roses Web Publishing http://www.breadandrosesweb.org/
"...ironically, perhaps, the best organised dissenters in the world today are anarchists, who are busily undermining capitalism while the rest of the left is still trying to form committees."
-- Jeremy Hardy, The Guardian (UK)