Anti WTO, IMF sites could be banned in Oz

DoreneFC at aol.com DoreneFC at aol.com
Tue Oct 1 08:19:29 PDT 2002


Does that mean the court would also hear a petition to ban

1. websites full of statistics that are so wrong as to be obscene?

2. Media outlets whose misinformation is also so egregious as to be obscene?

Thinking of a list of the above could be FUN! ;/-)))))

DoreneC

In a message dated 10/1/02 7:07:28 AM Pacific Daylight Time, qualiall at union.org.za writes:


> Subj: Anti WTO, IMF sites could be banned in Oz
> Date: 10/1/02 7:07:28 AM Pacific Daylight Time
> From: qualiall at union.org.za (Kevin Robert Dean)
> Sender: owner-lbo-talk at lists.panix.com
> Reply-to: <A HREF="mailto:lbo-talk at lists.panix.com">lbo-talk at lists.panix.com</A>
> To: lbo-talk at lists.panix.com
>
>
>
>
> Secret web bans in FOI amendments
> Simon Hayes
> October 01, 2002
>
> WEBSITES protesting against November's World Trade
> Organisation meeting in Sydney could be secretly banned
> under proposed laws.
>
> Several websites that call for violent disruption of the
> informal WTO summit have been targeted by NSW Police
> Minister Michael Costa, who has referred them for possible
> banning under federal internet censorship rules designed to
> rein in online pornography.
> Full:
> http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,5200940%255E15306,00.html
> ---
> Sent from UnionMail Service [http://mail.union.org.za]
>
>
-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <../attachments/20021001/5a49246d/attachment.htm>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list