But psychoanalysis as mythology? Only the most tendentious reading would support that. In "Sociology and Psychology" Adorno wrote of psychoanalysis going into the depths of the subject and finding society. Loosely, just add unconscious psychological processes (lately getting good support from the neurosciences and cognitive psychology, which used to think of the unconscious as myth and psychoanalysis as a dead duck), and you've got psychoanalysis. Randy ----- Original Message ----- From: <dredmond at efn.org> To: <lbo-talk at lists.panix.com> Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 7:01 PM Subject: Re: war sacrifice/psychoanalysis
> Quoting joanna bujes <joanna.bujes at ebay.sun.com>:
>
> > Psychoanalysis has also been extended to other realms: literary studies,
> > sociology, etc. I am very doubtful that it has any validity in those
> > domains.
>
> Psychoanalysis did have a genuinely radical moment, though - Freud was,
strange
> as it sounds, one of the first great theorists of the consumer culture.
The
> whole point of the Freudian revolution in psychology was (1) to replace
the
> notion of fixed, immutable identities with the notion of free-floating,
> malleable subjects, replete with personal microhistories, and (2) to
insist
> that all analysis has a moment of self-analysis. The later versions of
> psychoanalysis all but obliterated this radical insight underneath
reactionary
> mythologies of various kinds.
>
> -- Dennis
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Visit http://www.efn.org for all your community networking needs
>
>