I thought the Snitchens incident was despicable in that it was targetted at a friend and used the destruction of a personal relationship to serve his agenda. The break with the Nation may be felt by some as the sundering of a personal links, but was clearly framed by Hitch as an institutional disassociation based on politics. But then I have more sympathy for the politics of the latter act than the former, so that may shape my tolerance for each.
-- Nathan Newman
----- Original Message ----- From: "Max B. Sawicky" <sawicky at bellatlantic.net>
I seem to recall that his previous departure from left solidarity, the 'snitchens' episode, just happened to occur at the time his previous book was released. This suggests a bit more than self-promotion is at work.
mbs
Come on-- "pathetic", he's out there selling a book on Orwell for gods sake. Of course there's self-promotion involved to stage his own little "Orwell in miniature defection".
My complaint is that so few on the Left, Michael Moore and a few others excepting, have so little sense these days of creative marketing with good timing.
-- Nathan Newman
----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Kromm" <ckromm at mindspring.com> To: <lbo-talk at lists.panix.com> Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 8:11 AM Subject: It's all about Hitch
Doesn't anyone else find Hitch's endless self-promotion and publicity mongering over his "departure from the left" as really pathetic? Jesus, resign and move on already. His astonishing sense of self-importance and embarassing need to be noticed are really sad. And really, his columns were never *that* good ... witty, but never high on the "wow, that was insightful" scale ...
Chris Kromm Keep your eyes on the prize.