Hitchens: kill 'em before they start

Justin Schwartz jkschw at hotmail.com
Fri Sep 6 10:17:30 PDT 2002


Hmas may be popular among Palestinians becausew of its resistance to the occupation. There is evidence its religious views are not popular among Palestinians. Earlier in the summer someone posted a poll of Palestinians on their goals, and something less than 5% supported the idea of an Islamic state, as I recall. jks


>From: nathan at newman.org
>Reply-To: lbo-talk at lists.panix.com
>To: lbo-talk at lists.panix.com
>CC: lbo-talk at lists.panix.com
>Subject: Re: Hitchens: kill 'em before they start
>Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 09:58:37 -0700 (PDT)
>
>On Fri, 06 September 2002, "Marc Rodrigues" wrote:
> >>Hamas's suicide bombing is
> >> part of its harder
> >> >militancy but is as well tied to its adherents
> >> religious view of their
> >> >martydom.
> >
> > this may be true to some extent, but i think you're
> > oversimplyfying things.
> > there are divisions that exist between the plo and
> > hamas that are based
> > not only on religious grounds but also on what type of
> > concessions the
> > plo constantly makes to israel and the u.s. i was
> > referring to hitchens'
> > specific reference to "sharia" in the
>palestine
> > context, which i think
> > is a non-issue.
>
>But the reason for Hamas's refusal of any concessions
>is based on its religious views, that all of Palestine
>is consecrated Muslim lands (a mirror of the religious
>nationalists among the Israelis). As for Sharia, this
>is from Hamas's basic Covenant/constitution, written
>back in 1988 (see
>http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/mideast/hamas.htm for
>full text)-- the money line is at the end- "Any
>procedure in contradiction to Islamic Sharia, where
>Palestine is concerned, is null and void."
>
>********
>
>Strategies of the Islamic Resistance Movement:
>Palestine Is Isalmic aqf:
>
>Article Eleven:
>The Islamic Resistance Movement believes that the land
>of Palestine is an Islamic Waqf consecrated for future
>Moslem generations until Judgement Day. It, or any part
>of it, should not be squandered: it, or any part of it,
>should not be given up. Neither a single Arab country
>nor all Arab countries, neither any king or president,
>nor all the kings and presidents, neither any
>organization nor all of them, be they Palestinian or
>Arab, possess the right to do that. Palestine is an
>Islamic Waqf land consecrated for Moslem generations
>until Judgement Day. This being so, who could claim to
>have the right to represent Moslem generations till
>Judgement Day?
>
>This is the law governing the land of Palestine in the
>Islamic Sharia (law) and the same goes for any land the
>Moslems have conquered by force, because during the
>times of (Islamic) conquests, the Moslems consecrated
>these lands to Moslem generations till the Day of
>Judgement.
>
>It happened like this: When the leaders of the Islamic
>armies conquered Syria and Iraq, they sent to the
>Caliph of the Moslems, Umar bin-el-Khatab, asking for
>his advice concerning the conquered land - whether they
>should divide it among the soldiers, or leave it for
>its owners, or what? After consultations and
>discussions between the Caliph of the Moslems, Omar
>bin-el-Khatab and companions of the Prophet, Allah
>bless him and grant him salvation, it was decided that
>the land should be left with its owners who could
>benefit by its fruit. As for the real ownership of the
>land and the land itself, it should be consecrated for
>Moslem generations till Judgement Day. Those who are on
>the land, are there only to benefit from its fruit.
>This Waqf remains as long as earth and heaven remain.
>Any procedure in contradiction to Islamic Sharia, where
>Palestine is concerned, is null and void."

_________________________________________________________________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list